Tag: Ecclesville

  • The Break-Up of the Ecclesville Estate

    From Landed Estate to Fragmented Ownership (c.1886–1913)

    Introduction

    The break-up of the Ecclesville estate was not the result of a single event, but a gradual process shaped by inheritance law, family circumstance, and national land reform.

    Between the death of John Stuart Eccles in 1886 and the submission of the estate to the Irish Land Commission in 1913, Ecclesville passed from a unified landed estate into fragmented ownership.


    The Estate at Its Height

    By the mid-nineteenth century, Ecclesville was a substantial and well-defined landed estate in County Tyrone.

    It comprised:

    • Extensive agricultural lands across multiple townlands
    • The demesne centred on Ecclesville House
    • Mills, market interests, and local economic infrastructure

    Under John Stewart (or Stuart) Eccles, the estate represented a typical example of a mature Irish landed property.


    The Impact of the Entail (1873)

    In 1873, John Stewart (or Stuart) Eccles placed the estate under an entail in tail male.

    While intended to preserve the estate intact, this had unintended consequences:

    • No surviving male heir existed at his death in 1886
    • His daughter, Amy Eccles, became life tenant only
    • The estate could not be freely managed or restructured

    This legal rigidity left the estate poorly positioned to respond to the major changes that followed.


    The Irish Land Acts and Structural Change

    From the late nineteenth century, the Irish Land Acts fundamentally altered land ownership across Ireland.

    At Ecclesville:

    • Tenants were enabled to purchase their holdings
    • Land was sold in stages through the Land Commission
    • The landlord–tenant system steadily declined

    These changes did not occur suddenly, but over a period of years, gradually dismantling the estate.


    Progressive Sale of the Estate

    Between c.1886 and 1913:

    • Large portions of the estate were sold to occupying tenants
    • Estate income declined as rental structures disappeared
    • The geographical unity of the estate was lost

    By the early twentieth century:

    The Ecclesville estate, as a single territorial entity, had effectively ceased to exist.


    The Position by 1913

    In 1913, the estate was formally recorded in a Land Commission title (Abstract of Title).

    At this stage:

    • Most of the former estate lands had passed into tenant ownership
    • Only the house and its immediate demesne remained intact

    Crucially:

    The demesne followed a separate path from the wider estate

    • It was retained as a private residential holding
    • It later passed into the ownership of the Browne-Lecky family

    Separation of Estate and Demesne

    By the early twentieth century, Ecclesville had divided into two distinct realities:

    The Former Estate

    • Sold and redistributed under the Land Acts
    • No longer a unified property

    Ecclesville House and Demesne

    • Retained intact
    • Functioning as a private residence
    • Independent of the former estate structure

    This distinction is essential to understanding the later history of Ecclesville.


    Consequences of the Break-Up

    The break-up of the estate resulted in:

    • The end of landlord control over the surrounding lands
    • The disappearance of the estate as an economic unit
    • The transformation of tenants into owner-occupiers
    • The reduction of Ecclesville to a country house with limited lands

    Although the house survived, its original context had fundamentally changed.


    Relationship to the Entail and Disentailing

    The break-up of the estate occurred independently of the legal structure of the entail.

    • The physical estate was dismantled between c.1886 and 1913
    • The legal structure of the entail remained in force until 1944

    These were separate processes:

    • The Land Acts reshaped ownership in practice
    • The disentailing later resolved the legal framework

    Historical Significance

    The break-up of the Ecclesville estate reflects a wider transformation in Irish history:

    • The decline of the landed gentry
    • The redistribution of land to tenants
    • The dismantling of traditional estate structures

    In the case of Ecclesville, this process was shaped both by national reform and by the constraints imposed by inheritance law.


    Conclusion

    By the early twentieth century, Ecclesville had ceased to exist as a traditional landed estate.

    What remained was:

    • A reduced demesne centred on the house
    • A network of former estate lands now held by tenants

    The break-up of Ecclesville was therefore not an abrupt collapse, but a gradual transition from estate to fragmented ownership — a process completed long before the final legal disentailing of 1944.


    See Also

  • Ecclesville in 1830 (Full Text – Atkinson)

    Original Description from A. Atkinson

    ECCLESVILLE AND FINTONA.

    When we visited Ecclesville in 1830, it was then the seat of the late lamented John Dickson Eccles, Esq. proprietor of the Fintona estate, and a country gentleman of sterling worth, though of plain and unassuming manners.

    The demesne embraces about 250 acres of this property, lightly and ornamentally planted; but from its comparatively low position, it commands no prospect of the surrounding country; a fact in its topographic history, which need not be much lamented, since that country exhibits but little of the picturesque, and all that is necessary to a decent domestic landscape, may be found within the confines of Ecclesville demesne.

    The house, which stands at a short distance from the public road, at the bottom of a valley formed by gently sloping hills, is a plain but noble edifice (the expressive type of the founder’s honest mind, where the rich streams of benevolence, flowing through a retired valley to that invisible ocean, where they are now centred for ever, felt too deeply their own intrinsic worth, to court that sweet- smelling cowslip of popular applause, ‘which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven,’) and to this has been added all those plain and useful appendages of a family residence, which are necessary to decent rank and to substantial comfort.

    Fintona, a market and post town on this estate (which has several shops, and does some business in the corn trade) may be regarded as the capital of the property. It stands on a public road a little elevated above the valley of Ecclesville, of which it commands an imperfect view; and although the appearance of this town is not remarkably attractive, we understand a good deal of business is done there; to which the policy of granting to improving tenants, leases in perpetuity, of houses and plots for building, must largely contribute; while a similar indulgence to persons of neither property nor talent, would mar the improvement of the town, and inflict a needless wound upon the interests of the landlord. To this admirable plan of giving the tenant a perpetual interest in his town holding, we would recommend (in every possible case) the addition of a few acres of land for the accommodation of his town establishment. This land, being held at a moderate rent on a lease of lives or years, would have a favourable influence on the interests of the whole estate, as the value of farms approximating with it would advance in an exact ratio with the wealth and population of the neighbouring town; and we hope this also is the policy of the Eccles family.

    The valley of Ecclesville is separated from the town of Fintona by a water called the Casheron river, which passes through the Fintona estate. On this a corn mill has been erected for the accommodation of the tenantry, and a site for another mill with a fall of from seven to ten feet is said to exist upon the same river, and of course presents to some enterprising man of business, an inducement to form a bleaching or manufacturing establishment at that place. If the successors of the late Mr. Eccles follow his example, we have no doubt they will be found ready to give all due encouragement to this and every other instrument of employment to the poor that may be found to exist in their immediate neighbourhood; for from all that we could learn of the character of that lamented gentleman, as a landlord, a magistrate, and a man, his sudden removal by death, while we were travelling in his native county, was felt to be a public loss; and as such was very justly and generally deplored, by the poor and by the public.

    ‘Ireland in the Nineteenth Century, and Seventh of England’s Dominion: Enriched with Copious Descriptions of the Resources of the Soil, and Seats and Scenery of the North West District’

    By A. Atkinson. Esq.

  • The Death of Charles Eccles (1869): Contemporary Obituary

    Full Original Text from the Londonderry Sentinel


    Introduction

    On 4 November 1869, Charles Eccles of Ecclesville, one of the most respected landlords in County Tyrone, passed away after a prolonged illness.

    His death prompted an extraordinary outpouring of public grief, captured in a detailed obituary published in the Londonderry Sentinel.

    Presented here in full, this account offers a rare and powerful insight into how he was regarded by his contemporaries—not merely as a landowner, but as a man deeply admired and, in the words of the time, beloved.


    A Landlord Beloved

    “We shall not say that Mr. Eccles was esteemed in this neighbourhood—he was more… he was beloved.”

    The obituary makes clear that Charles Eccles was not simply respected—he inspired genuine affection across all levels of society.


    Full Obituary (Original Text)

    DEATH OF CHARLES ECCLES, ESQ., D.L. (4th November 1869)

    It has never been our lot to discharge a more painful duty than to record the death of Charles Eccles, Esq., J. P., D.L., which took place at Ecclesville, on Thursday, the 4th inst., after a lengthened and distressing illness. The announcement some months ago, that he had become prostrated by disease, and that the medical gentlemen attending him entertained no hope of his recovery, was received throughout this county with the deepest regret, and although his was not a case in which the public could be said to have found any grounds for hoping against hope, the report of his death seemed in the end to carry with it the bitterness of a loss to which they had not yet been reconciled, while it produced in many breasts a sensation to which only the death of some actually beloved one can give rise.

    We shall not say that Mr. Eccles was esteemed in this neighbourhood—he was more; the word which we have already used is a preferable one—he was beloved, beloved by his family, his friends, his tenantry, by every one who had an opportunity of knowing his worth. Upon the sorrowing circle at Ecclesville, we shall not, as it were in the presence of their dead, rudely enter to dilate upon the tenderness of home-relationships, rather would we simply offer them our respectful sympathy and condolence.

    Outside that sacred bound however, we may more freely speak and to none of the excellencies in the character of this lamented gentleman would we give more prominence than the course which he invariably pursued in dealing with his tenants. He respected tenant-right and declared that he would regard himself as a robber were he to infringe upon it; the interest of the tenants in their beneficial improvements he looked upon as property the most sacred, and in the valuation of holdings upon his estate gave express directions not to value improvements, nor fix the rent at such a figure as would restrict the comforts of the tenant.

    His income he considered ample for all his wants and he often generously observed that by increasing it he could add nothing to his own comfort while he abridged that of his tenants. Wherever the hand of death left a widow or helpless family upon the Ecclesville property, the rent was certain to be reduced for a longer or shorter period, so that the holding might not fall to a new occupant; and as in money so in political principle. Mr. Eccles was jealous of the independence of his tenantry and thought no greater evil could exist than the exercise of a landlord’s power to coerce the votes and public action of his people.

    He would reason with his tenants and endeavour to show them that his interests and theirs were identical in matters affecting the public weal, but he would not injure or oppress those who differed from him; nevertheless few men were more willingly followed by their tenantry, for by his recognition of them as “independent electors” in the true meaning of the term, by his liberal management of his property, respecting tenant-right, giving leases to every tenant of good character and industry, and always charging moderate rents, he won not only their votes but their hearts; in short the regard in which he was held was almost idolatrous, and partook more of an uncalculating feudal attachment than of the staid, measured feelings of modern times.

    Mr. Eccles’ manner was peculiarly genial and winning, and though retiring and unobtrusive, few had greater influence over those with whom they came in contact; he had a profound knowledge of men and things, his opinions were matured, carefully reasoned out and settled, no one saw better the difficulties of a position, or was more fertile in expedients to remove or nullify them. Those who knew him intimately gladly resorted to him for advice and direction, and his sound sense, thorough knowledge of life, and unblemished honour, made him a safe and trusted guide.

    Of Mr. Eccles as a public man our readers had many opportunities of judging. As a Magistrate, Grand Juror, Governor of the District Asylum, Member of the Board of Superintendence, &c., he was well known in the county, and known everywhere to be admired and respected. Nay it is a remarkable fact that slander which is so generally equipped for an attack either upon the living or dead, does not appear to have even one of its unhallowed shafts to level at his memory. We have heard his character discussed by men of high as well as men of humble standing, by Liberals and Conservatives; we have heard it discussed in the motley crowd, and we gathered from every source the same estimate, found him everywhere described as one of the few men who could be named in the cause of human excellence.

    But better than all, he turned his thoughts to something still higher and nobler. Not content with mere morality, not content with occupying a high place in the estimation and in the affections of those around him, not content with having within his reach an ample share of the best pleasures of this life, he sought for an earnest of the pleasures of the life to come; he grounded his faith upon the Rock of Ages, and, when his earthly pleasures failed:

    “He sent his hopes on high, looked up and reached
    His sickle forth, and reaped the fields of heaven,
    And plucked the clusters from the vines of God,”

    The Eccles family settled in Fintona during the reign of Charles II., and are amongst the oldest and most influential of the county families. They derived their surname from the Barony of Eccles in Dumfriesshire which they held in Scotland. Eighth in descent from John de Eccles, a person of rank in the reign of Alexander the 3rd, was John Eccles of Kildonan in Ayrshire who lived in the early part of the 17th century and had two sons, John and Gilbert; the eldest was a distinguished royalist, Gilbert settled in Ireland in the reign of Charles I., and purchased several manors in Tyrone and Fermanagh. He died, as appears from his cenotaph in the old church of Fintona, July 26, 1694, at the advanced age of 92, and was succeeded in the Tyrone property by his eldest son Charles Eccles, who was High Sheriff of Tyrone in 1694 and was great-great-great-grandfather of the gentleman just deceased.

    The late Mr. Eccles was born 9th April 1813 and married Isabella, daughter of Edward Blake, Esq., of Castlegrove, County Galway, who died in 1859. He served as High Sheriff of Tyrone in 1835 and was a Magistrate and Deputy-Lieutenant of the County. He was on several occasions requested to stand for the representation of Tyrone but persistently declined the honour. He received the first requisition on this subject shortly after he had attained his majority and had then an offer of support from all the leading gentry of the county; subsequently he was urged by a very influential nobleman to allow himself to be put in nomination, and again and again a similar proposition emanated from different sources, but he preferred having the honour conferred on others to seeking it himself.

    Had he been induced to come forward there could be as little doubt as to his success as there would have been to his ability to stand upon the floor of the House and, with polished eloquence and enlightened judgment, address himself to any question of the day.

    Mr. Eccles is succeeded by his eldest son, John Stuart Eccles, Esq., who about twelve months ago attained his majority.

    On Monday last, the day fixed for consigning the mortal remains of the deceased to their resting place, a vast concourse assembled at Ecclesville to embrace their last opportunity of publicly manifesting their respect for his memory. Carriages arrived every few moments, and the trains from Derry and Enniskillen brought large numbers from the towns along the line. Omagh contributed its quota to the melancholy gathering, and though so many miles distant from Ecclesville nearly all the principal shopkeepers partially closed their places of business, while the peals of the Omagh Church bell further reminded the inhabitants that death had been executing its fatal mission in their county.

    At the hour fixed the mournful procession left Ecclesville in the following order:—

    Pall Bearers

    Col. The Hon. Stuart Knox, M.P.
    Capt. Ynyr H. Burges
    Wm. Archdall, Esq., D.L.
    J. G. Vesey Porter
    Capt. George Perry M’Clintock, D.L.
    Major A. W. Cole Hamilton, D.L.
    Thomas H. Browne, Esq., D.L.
    Samuel Vesey, Esq., D.L.
    Capt. Mervyn Stewart
    Capt. Thomas Auchinleck, J.P.

    Chief Mourners

    John S. Eccles, Esq.
    Rev. Robert G. Eccles
    Dr. Henry Thompson
    Charles B. Eccles, Esq.
    Sir Richard McCausland
    Rev. Mungo Thompson

    The tenants of the Ecclesville Estate, all wearing scarfs and hat bands.

    The Ecclesville labourers with hat bands.

    The remainder of the procession was made up of men of every class and creed, appearing for the moment to anticipate the time when they themselves would have “shuffled off this mortal coil” and entered side by side into that common inheritance to which they were all hastening.

    Amongst those present were—The Very Rev. the Dean of Clonfert; Very Rev. the Dean of Clogher; Rev. R. V. Dixon, D.D.; Rev. W. S. Burnside, D.D.; Rev. John Grey Porter; Rev. Samuel Alexander; Rev. T. L. Stack; Rev. H. L. St. George; Rev. Henry Tottenham; Rev. W. Moutray; Rev. Charles H. Stack; Rev. Charles Maguinness; Rev. J. C. Hudson; Rev. John Flanagan; Rev. George Sidney Smith, jun.; Rev. Charles F. Jones; Rev. J. Whittaker; Rev. J. Rowland Scott; Rev. P. Kerr; Rev. J. M’Groarty; Rev. J. Thornhill; Rev. R. Chambers; Rev. John Arnold; Rev. John Smyth; Rev. William Mulloy; Rev. J. McArdle; Rev. J. Cassidy;

    Colonel Dawson; Major Francis Ellis; Captain Butler; Captain Corr; Captain R. C. D. Ellis; Captain Knox; Captain Sinclair; Captain J. J. O’F. Carmichael Ferrall; Captain Vesey; Captain L. M. Buchanan; Captain Jenkins; Captain R. S. Hamilton;

    George A. Molony, Esq., R.M.; W. Cole Hamilton, Esq., B.M.; A. W. H. Heard, Esq., D.L.; Nicholas M. Archdall, Esq., D.L.; George Scott Mansfield, Esq., J.P.; James Crossle, Esq., J.P.; Edward Waller, Esq., J.P.; A. C. Buchanan, Esq., J.P.; George Hall Stack, Esq., J.P.; J. W. Ellison Macartney, Esq., High Sheriff of Armagh; Wm. F. Black, Esq., J.P.; James Greer, jun., Esq.; Edward Atthill, Esq., J.P.; A. O. S. M. McCausland, Esq.; James Mackay, Esq.; George A. Rogers, Esq.; Millar Simpson, Esq.; William Caldwell, Esq.; Mansergh G. Buchanan, Esq.; James Campbell, Esq., S.I.; George Vesey Stewart; Richard Tottenham, Esq., J.P.;

    Dr. Robinson, J.P.; Dr. West; Dr. Wilson; Dr. Love; Dr. Buchanan; Dr. Trenar; Quarter-master John Core; Robert Buchanan, Esq.; John Dickson, Esq.; George Woodhouse, Esq.; James Johnston, Esq.; John Dickson, jun., Esq.; Hugh Allen, Esq.; M. Moore, Esq.; Cecil Moore, Esq.; T. C. Dickie, Esq.; Whitney Moutray, Esq., J.P.; Henry Moutray, Esq., J.P.; Finlay Buchanan, Esq.; Charles Richardson, &c., &c.

    Only a small portion of those present could gain admittance to the church, and through the anxiety to follow the coffin the doors were literally blocked up by those who were fortunate enough to be near the front of the procession.

    The first portion of the burial service was read by the Rev. H. Tottenham, assisted by the Rev. John McGroarty, and before leaving the church the Rev. Dr. Burnside delivered a short but impressive address. He enumerated the payment of a tribute of respect for the departed, the comfort which it brought to the mourners, and the instruction which it was calculated to convey to them and to their sympathising friends.

    He alluded in feeling terms to the many claims which the deceased gentleman had upon the respect of all who knew him, to his amiability in every relation of life, and to the bright example which was to be found in his career, whether as a devoted husband, an affectionate father, or an indulgent landlord, and made touching reference to his conversion and deeply rooted piety, whereby his affections had been most fully weaned off the things of earth, and through which he was enabled to look upon his approaching dissolution, not as the dreaded appearance of the King of Terrors, but as the appointed and glorious means of opening to him the gates of everlasting bliss.

    Dr. Burnside, in conclusion, called the attention of his hearers to the prayer of the Psalmist, “So teach us to number our days that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom,” and expressed an earnest hope that divinely taught and guided they might, at the final hour, be enabled to say with the deceased, “O grave where is thy victory, O death where is thy sting?”

    An appropriate hymn was sung by the choir while the coffin was being removed, and the funeral procession having re-formed, the remains were borne to the ancient burying ground of Donacavey where the coffin was laid in the family vault, and all that remained of this highly gifted and noble man was, with the deep impressiveness of the concluding portion of the burial service, committed to its kindred earth, in sure and certain hope of a glorious resurrection.


    His Treatment of Tenants

    “He respected tenant-right and declared that he would regard himself as a robber were he to infringe upon it.”

    One of the most striking aspects of the obituary is its emphasis on his progressive and humane estate management:

    • Improvements belonged to tenants
    • Rents were kept moderate
    • Widows and vulnerable families were protected
    • Voting independence was respected

    A Philosophy of Responsibility

    “By increasing it he could add nothing to his own comfort while he abridged that of his tenants.”

    This passage reflects a rare mindset among 19th-century landlords—placing tenant welfare above personal income.


    Public Life and Character

    “He was… one of the few men who could be named in the cause of human excellence.”

    Charles Eccles held multiple public roles:

    • Magistrate
    • Deputy Lieutenant
    • Grand Juror
    • Governor of the District Asylum

    Yet the obituary insists his greatest distinction was moral character, not office.


    Faith and Final Reflections

    “He grounded his faith upon the Rock of Ages…”

    The closing sections of the obituary move from public life to spiritual reflection, portraying a man whose identity extended beyond estate and status.


    The Funeral: A County in Mourning

    “A vast concourse assembled… to manifest their respect for his memory.”

    The scale of the funeral speaks volumes:

    • Large crowds arriving by rail and carriage
    • Businesses in Omagh partially closed
    • Tenantry attending in mourning dress
    • Representation from all classes and creeds

    The Procession

    Pall Bearers

    • Col. The Hon. Stuart Knox, M.P.
    • Capt. Ynyr H. Burges
    • Wm. Archdall, Esq., D.L.
    • J. G. Vesey Porter
    • Capt. George Perry M’Clintock, D.L.
    • Major A. W. Cole Hamilton, D.L.
    • Thomas H. Browne, Esq., D.L.
    • Samuel Vesey, Esq., D.L.
    • Capt. Mervyn Stewart
    • Capt. Thomas Auchinleck, J.P.

    Chief Mourners

    • John S. Eccles, Esq.
    • Rev. Robert G. Eccles
    • Dr. Henry Thompson
    • Charles B. Eccles, Esq.
    • Sir Richard McCausland
    • Rev. Mungo Thompson

    The Wider Gathering

    “Men of every class and creed…”

    The attendees included:

    • Clergy from across denominations
    • Military officers
    • Landed gentry
    • Magistrates and professionals
    • Tenants and labourers

    All united in a shared moment of remembrance.


    The Burial

    “Committed to its kindred earth, in sure and certain hope of a glorious resurrection.”

    The burial took place at Donacavey, the ancestral resting place of the family.

    A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Burnside emphasised:

    • His character as husband and father
    • His role as landlord
    • His religious conviction

    A Lasting Legacy

    “The regard in which he was held was almost idolatrous…”

    This obituary stands as more than a record of death—it is a portrait of a man and a system of landholding at its most idealised.

    It captures:

    • A moment before the upheavals of land reform
    • A model of landlord-tenant relations rarely achieved
    • The deep emotional ties that could exist within an estate

    Editorial Note

    This obituary is presented in full and in its original form. Paragraph spacing and section headings have been added for readability; the text itself remains unaltered.


    Related Pages